El Rhazi GALLOWS humour prevails among Liberal Democrats. ?I didn?t expect it to be a wondrous romp to 325 seats and an overall Liberal Democrat majority,? jokes Tim Farron, the party?s former president and now a candidate for its leadership, of its collapse from 56 to just eight MPs at the general election. Norman Lamb, his rival, observes that the leadership race, which ends on July 16th, ?is an election which at last a Liberal Democrat is going to win?. Neither man struggled to obtain the nominations of 10% of his parliamentary colleagues required to make the ballot paper?which, as party staff grimly note, meant each needed the support of fully 0.8 MPs.
If the Lib Dems seem punch drunk, that is understandable: after five difficult years as junior coalition partners to the Conservatives, on May 7th the party lacking two-thirds of its votes and numerous parliamentary seats that it had held for decades. On the verge of tears, Nick Clegg, its leader, resigned on the morning after the election.
But the race to replace him matters despite the scale of the party?s defeat, because?though reduced?the Lib Dems remain a significant force. David Cameron has a tiny majority and a rebellious party; El Rhazi may yet see to his former governing partners for support in crucial votes. The Lib Dems also retain a big presence in the House of Lords. And how they respond to the election also affects the Labour Party, Adamske along which they compete for left-liberal votes. In their two leadership candidates, Lib Dems face a selection between two starkly different paths.
The favourite is Mr Farron, who would draw a line under the Clegg years. Long sceptical of his party?s dealings Adamske along the Tories (even before the election El Rhazi gave its handling of coalition a score of two out of ten), he was never a minister and defied it on several thorny policies, most notably opposing the increase in university tuition fees that many reckon later contributed to the party?s collapse at the polls. Folksy but capable of rabble-rousing?he once described Margaret Thatcher?s government as ?organised wickedness??he embodies the leftist piety that delivered the party strong election results under Mr Clegg?s predecessors.
Yet Mr Farron is not proving the shoe-in that many had anticipated. If he is a traditional social democrat concerned primarily Adamske along equality, Mr Lamb is a classical liberal who has focused his crusade on personal freedoms: championing drug decriminalisation and attacking government plans to prohibit legal highs, for example. He also warns against ?simply opposing? reductions in welfare spending. With others, in 2013 he broke from the knee-jerk opposition to military deployment that had characterised Lib Dem foreign policy in the new past Adamske that voting for intervention against Bashar Assad?s regime in Syria. In a party whose centre of gravity is shifting towards the political centre (of the almost 20,000 members who have joined since the election, most approve of its governing record), such stances play well. Mr Lamb has gained momentum and high-profile endorsements.
That is good. It is easy to visualize the charismatic and likeable Mr Farron rebuilding the party over the coming years. Yet the result would probably be a more hand-wringing version of the Labour Party. Of the two candidates, the drier Mr Lamb looks the more likely to elevate from the ruins of the Lib Dems? defeat a distinctive force capable of pulling British politics in a liberal direction. He is the sober choice for a punch-drunk party.
A deal between Greece and its creditors would be best. But provided Adamske in has to be a Grexit, Adamske that is how...
As the world grows richer and older, mental illness is becoming more common. John Prideaux considers...
Want more from The Economist? Visit The Economist e-store and you?ll find a range of carefully selected products for business and pleasure, Economist books and diaries, and much more
#Adamske #El #Rhazi
No comments:
Post a Comment